fierke/logofclient
2
2
Fork 0
Code Issues 20 Pull Requests Releases 3 Wiki Activity

[bug:] union produces one item too much #26

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-01-19 18:31:03 +00:00 by fierke · 5 comments
fierke commented 2026-01-19 18:31:03 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source
No description provided.
fierke added this to the logofclient v0.8.0 milestone 2026-01-19 18:31:03 +00:00
fierke added the Kind/Bug
Reviewed
Confirmed
1
Priority
Critical
1
 labels 2026-01-19 18:31:03 +00:00
fierke self-assigned this 2026-01-19 18:31:03 +00:00
fierke commented 2026-04-23 14:25:18 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

needed: introduce ways on how the comparision works (e.g. by refsid, ID or full address)

needed: introduce ways on how the comparision works (e.g. by refsid, ID or full address)
fierke commented 2026-04-27 08:52:04 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

moving to 0.8.1 since it needs to be tested

moving to 0.8.1 since it needs to be tested
fierke modified the milestone from logofclient v0.8.0 to logofclient 0.8.1 2026-04-27 08:54:35 +00:00
fierke commented 2026-04-29 06:24:35 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

sometimes one item less than expected, etc.

sometimes one item less than expected, etc.
fierke added a new dependency 2026-04-29 06:24:40 +00:00
#38 [chore:] reimplement combining using selectable comparators
fierke commented 2026-05-02 10:53:08 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

comparing by KAS-refsid works

comparing by KAS-refsid works
fierke commented 2026-05-02 10:58:01 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

fixed with 488830cdad

a few months ago we fixed import with "" → may have been the problem

fixed with 488830cdad5d7ed77fb8b4435ab21eee5ba20b83 a few months ago we fixed import with "" → may have been the problem
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Compat/Breaking
Breaking change that won't be backward compatible
 Kind/Bug
Something is not working
 Kind/Documentation
Documentation changes
 Kind/Enhancement
Improve existing functionality
 Kind/Feature
New functionality
 Kind/Security
This is security issue
 Kind/Testing
Issue or pull request related to testing
Priority
Critical
1
The priority is critical
Priority
High
2
The priority is high
Priority
Low
4
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
3
The priority is medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
1
Issue has been confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
2
This issue or pull request already exists
Reviewed
Invalid
3
Invalid issue
Reviewed
Won't Fix
3
This issue won't be fixed
Status
Abandoned
3
Somebody has started to work on this but abandoned work
Status
Blocked
1
Something is blocking this issue or pull request
Status
Need More Info
2
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work
No Label Kind/Bug
Priority
Critical
1
Reviewed
Confirmed
1
Milestone
No items
No Milestone logofclient 0.8.1
Assignees
Clear assignees
fierke (Elias Fierke)
No Assignees fierke
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Depends on
#38 [chore:] reimplement combining using selectable comparators
fierke/logofclient
Reference: fierke/logofclient#26
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?